Just as verso rabbi may not permit that which is forbidden, so must he be careful not esatto forbid that which is permitted. Therefore, if a rabbi must forbid something merely because of per question of law, because of per custom, or because of special circumstances, he must state his reason so as not sicuro establish an erroneous precedent.

Nevertheless, it is forbidden for verso city preciso split into two congregations primarily because of per dispute over law or practice

A rabbi should be careful not to render an unusual or anomalous decision, unless he carefully explains the reasons for it. Therefore, any uncommon decision that depends on subtle or esoteric reasoning should not be publicized, lest it lead preciso erroneous conclusions. It is for this reason that there are cases which are permitted only sopra the case of verso scholar, and which may not be taught onesto the ignorant.

When per rabbi renders a decision in verso case per which http://www.datingranking.net/it/sudy-review there are per niente clear precedents, he must strive preciso bring as many proofs as possible…

When a rabbi renders a decision durante a question of law, the Torah recognizes it as binding. Therefore, when per rabbi decides on per case and forbids something, it becomes intrinsically forbidden.

Since the initial decision renders the subject of a case intrinsically forbidden, it cannot be permitted even by per greater sage or by per majority rule.

An erroneous decision cannot render a case intrinsically forbidden. Therefore, if a second rabbi is able preciso show that the original decision is refuted by generally accepted authorities or codes, he may reverse the original decision.

Similarly, per decision that is retracted with good reason does not render verso case intrinsically forbidden. Therefore, if verso second rabbi is able puro determine that common practice traditionally opposes the initial ong authorities, he may convince the first rabbi preciso retract his decision and permit the case in question. Individual logic and judgment, however, are not considered sufficient reason for per rabbi to reverse even his own decision…

Per order preciso prevent controversy, one should not present per case before a rabbi without informing him of any previous decisions associated with that particular case.

One rabbi can overturn the decision of another only if he can prove the initial decision esatto be erroneous

Although the Torah demands verso insecable degree of uniformity con practice, it does recognize geographical differences. Therefore, different communities may follow varying opinions mediante minor questions of Torah law.

However, where there is mai geographical or similar justification for varied practices, such differences are liable to be associated with ideological divergences and are forbidden. Within verso solo community, the Torah requires a high degree of uniformity mediante religious practice. Mediante niente affatto case should it be made esatto appear that there is more than one Torah.

It is written, “You are children of God your Lord; you must not mutilate yourselves (lo tit-godedu)” (Deut. 14:1). Just as it is forbidden preciso mutilate one’s body, so is it prohibited to mutilate the body of Judaism by dividing it into factions. Onesto do so is puro disaffirm the universal fatherhood of God and the unity of His Torah.

It is therefore forbidden for members of verso solo congregation sicuro form factions, each following per different practice or opinion. It is likewise forbidden for a scapolo rabbinical athletique preciso issue per split decision.

However, where a city has more than one congregation, or more than one rabbinical capable, the following of each one is counted as a separate community, and each one may follow different practices.