27/06/2022 4

Hypothesis step one & 2: smaller demand for cancer character, particularly in female: Univariate general linear design with reputation (compliment versus

Abilities.

cancer) and you may intercourse because fixed issues and you may interest in a night out together as measured to some extent dos (we.age., shortly after malignant tumors revelation) due to the fact oriented varying try performed. 86, p 2 = .744), with initially notice (F(1,134) = 351.9, p dos = .724) describing a lot of the difference regarding dating attention; whenever you are head negative effects of sex (F(step 1, 134) = 0.46, p = .497, ? 2 = .003) and reputation (F(1, step one34) = step one.12, p = .292, ? 2 = .008), and their interaction (F(step one, 134) = dos.69, p = .103, ? dos = .020) were not high (get a hold of Table 2 having function). Correctly, an equivalent study in the place of 1st interest because covariate altered the general abilities (F(3,135) = step 3.4, p = .020, ? 2 = .070), no significant fundamental feeling to own reputation (F(1, step 135) = step one.01, p = .316, ? dos = .007) or the correspondence effect (F(1, 135) = 0.2, p = .211, ? 2 = .012). However, without accounting to possess first focus, a critical yet brief effect of intercourse is actually receive, in which people (Yards = 5.5, SD = .2.4) advertised higher interest in a date full than just lady (Yards = 4.3, SD = dos.4; F(step 1,135) = 8.step one, p = .005, ? 2 = .057).

We accounted for first interest just like the counted simply step one and you can inserted it as covariate (initially focus and you may focus once next section of malfunction correlated highly, r =

Research of traits: General linear designs which have position and you may sex because fixed things and you can the fresh characteristics due to the fact oriented changeable shown differences in around three of your own eight attributes. Participants about malignant tumors status assessed new demonstrated character as more interesting (Yards = six.2, SD = step one.6) than participants from the healthy reputation (Meters = 5.six, SD = dos.0; F(step one,135) = 5.6, p = .020; d = 0.33), along with a lot more daring (Meters = six.9; SD = step one.seven compared to Yards = 6.1; SD = step one.9, F(1,135) = 6.eight, p = .011; d = 0.39) and you will healthier (M = six.7; SD = step 1.7 against Yards = 5.9; SD = step one.8; F(step one,135) = 7.eight, p = .006; d = 0.46). No significant outcomes was in fact discover to possess sex or perhaps the correspondence regarding reputation and you may gender. Correlations between the assessment regarding qualities and interest in a romantic date ranged somewhat anywhere between criteria (Desk 3). Both in standards, respondents have been interested in a night out together after they assessed the new person as being way more interesting, separate, match, comedy, and you can strong. Although not, attract out of participants about fit position has also been pertaining to her or him viewing the individual as more courageous, whereas this is not true on malignant tumors status. Interest out-of participants on cancer condition are about their investigations of one’s other individual to be amicable and you can educated, while it was untrue from the healthy status.

Most useful time for revelation: Regarding complete classification, the vast majority (letter = 105, 76%) wished to realize about a cancer tumors history after a couple of dates, 7% (n = 10) from the date that is first, 1% (letter = 2) before first date, and you can step 1% (n = 1) whenever agreeing to have an exclusive relationship, 20 participants expressed ‘other’ (15%). These types of preferences differed anywhere between standards (? 2 (4) = a dozen.2, p more = .016), which have respondents regarding the cancer tumors standing answering with greater regularity which they wants to find out about which within first date (11% versus. 3%), and you may none of them (0% against. 3%) proving which they would like to read about this whenever deciding to have a personal relationship. To account fully for an empty telephone on cancer condition, i excluded the brand new reacting classification `when private? and reran the research, with the effect kept significant (? dos (3) = ten.9, p = .012).

CÙNG CHUYÊN MỤC

CÁC BƯỚC ĐĂNG KÝ

BƯỚC 1 KIỂM TRA TRÌNH ĐỘ ĐẦU VÀO

BƯỚC 2 TƯ VẤN LỘ TRÌNH PHÙ HỢP

BƯỚC 3 GHI DANH VÀO LỚP

BƯỚC 1
BƯỚC 2
BƯỚC 3